Essay Copernicus and the Lack of Freedom of Speech Before...

Freedom of Speech, Assembly, Petition, Press and Freedom of Religion was granted to us on 1791, but what about the time before that? What were people’s rights, did they even have any? Nicolaus Copernicus was one of the many people who lived through the early Reformation. During that time the Catholic Church controlled the people. Anyone who disobeyed the Catholic Church was either put into prison or even sentenced to death. The major concept that the Catholic Church held was the geocentric theory, that the Earth is the center of the universe. Their argument was that God had not only blessed humans with its nature but also granted humans a special place to live, which was in the center of the universe. However Copernicus was not completely†¦show more content†¦Although Copernicus’ theory was against the Catholic Church, some parts of it were still based on the beliefs of the Catholic Church. Part of his heliocentric model was that the Earth rotated from west to east in a perfect circle. Why from west to east? Copernicus believed this because simply it was commanded by God. Why a perfect circle? Copernicus shared this concept with many other astronomers. Astronomers believed that since God is perfect he made the planets orbit in a perfect shape, circle. This concept was later on corrected by Johannes Kepler, who was also very religious and he stated that the planets orbit in a perfect ellipse. If Copernicus was sure that the geocentric model was wrong then why did he hesitate to publish his model of heliocentric? The book mentioned that although Copernicus knew that the geocentric model was wrong he still had his doubts about his own model. Doubts concerning whether the heliocentric model was wrong or maybe incomplete. Researchers say that he hesitated because he was afraid that the Catholic Church would disagree with his model. However it might not be that he is afraid of being against the Catholic Church but he had a hard time considering that the Catholic Church had made a mistake. Copernicus’ had became so widely known for his work that people all around Europe were waiting eagerly for the complete publication of his heliocentric model, and because of him

Banning Handguns Is Not The Answer - 1671 Words

Gun control is a growing issue, as more and more tragedies occur throughout our nation each and every day. While many people believe that our country should place more restrictions and bans on guns to protect citizens and prevent the great amount of adversity present within our nation, others feel that banning guns is not the answer when examining the hardship that guns cause. They believe that banning guns is ineffective and will only create more problems, putting innocent lives at a higher risk. In the argument, â€Å"Banning Handguns is not the Answer†, the author argues that banning handguns is an ineffective answer to gun control because it fails to protect lives, it takes away a means of self defense, and it does not solve the issue†¦show more content†¦While this is a logical premise brought forth, the only backing the author includes is a testimony from John Stossel, a newspaper columnist. He includes Stossel’s opinion on the issue, who supports the ide a that banning guns takes away a form of self defense. The author’s support is mere opinion, weakening his argument. He provides no situation in which a gun was needed in the form of self defense, contributing no validation for his argument. Ethos One very noticeable element when first looking at the article is the absence of an author, as well as a publication date. Without any author to reference the written information within the argument to, it makes it hard for the audience to feel the information being presented is honest and truthful. With no publication date, it is hard to know if the information is relevant and recent. The author could be including facts in the argument that could have been true when the piece was written, but not in present day, and the reader would not be aware of this because of a missing publication date. Overall, the absence of these two elements greatly diminishes the paper’s credibility, consequently weakening the argument before even reading the actual piece. Within the text, the author references only three outside sources throughout his argument, one of which is continuously referred to within his text. He provides a description of Chicago during a gun ban attributing â€Å"authorS how MoreRelatedEssay On Gun Violence In Memphis1462 Words   |  6 Pagesdelinquency, risky sexual behaviors, and substance abuse. Some may disagree with banning guns! Some may feel that Banning guns will still fail to protect people, and in fact, may put people in greater danger because they prevent people from using handguns as an effective means of self-defense. When an individual is responsible and trained properly, handguns are easily the most effective form of self-defense, and a handgun ban takes this option away from them. John Stossel, who is a nationally syndicatedRead MoreWhy Handguns Should Not Be Banned760 Words   |  4 PagesWhy Handguns Should Not Be Banned The first thought that comes to mind when most people think of â€Å"handguns† is death. A handgun is described as a firearm that can be held with one hand, such as a revolver or a pistol. Because of it’s size a handgun can be easily concealed and therefore one of many weapons used in violent crimes particularly within inner city communities. Will banning handguns decrease crime? Should handguns only be carried by law officials and military personnel? Handguns do notRead MoreAnti Gun Laws : Is It The Answer?955 Words   |  4 PagesANTI-GUN LAWS – IS IT THE ANSWER? In today’s society there is a huge debate between Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun supporters. The debate is whether or not the everyday law abiding citizen should continue to have the right to own a firearm. The law abiding citizen who choose to own a handgun for self-defense and with proper training can easily do so. But law abiding citizens are not the only ones who also choose to carry a firearm; criminals take advantage of this as well. The law abiding citizen followsRead MoreThe Editorial Came Out Of The Los Angeles Times986 Words   |  4 Pagesthe United States. Europe also has to deal with majority of the same problems. Specifically in England they have banned the private ownership of handguns (Wilson). This is not a surprising fact with Europeans not being as big a gun proponent as Americans. The alarming fact about gun laws was that after England made owning a handgun illegal their handgun crime went up drastically (Wilson). Majority of the European countries attacking the United States ways of dealing with the issue had more violentRead MoreEssay on Gun Control1399 Words   |  6 Pagesliving environment in America. Guns should only be able to be purchased in stores and not locally because they cannot be given to irresponsible or dangerous people, easier to enforce background checks, and this would be a great substitute instead of banning guns. Guns should only be able to be purchased in stores and not locally because they cannot be given to dangerous or irresponsible people. The national rifle association (NRA) only suggests severe punishments after a criminal has already committedRead MoreGun Control And The Right Of The Citizens Of Its Country Essay1469 Words   |  6 PagesUnited States of America clearly worded this in the bill of rights for the self-preservation of the citizens of its country. For the past few decades, the Second Amendment has been put under astonishing stress with laws dealing with regulating and banning certain firearms. There are usually two sides to the controversial topic regarding the Second Amendment and they both are strongly tied to the two most prominent political parties : The Republicans wanting more gun rights and the Democrats wantingRead MoreNo More Gun Control Needed1281 Words   |  6 PagesNo More Gun Control Needed The debate of whether or not the government should ban the sell of guns, and attempt to remove all guns in existence has been debated for a long period of time; I believe that banning guns is not only implausible, it will do more harm than good. In this essay, I’ll be discussing the history of this debate, as well as discuss some misinformation that’s been proposed by those wishing to ban guns. I’ll also discuss how guns do not turn ordinary, law abiding citizens intoRead MoreWhy The Government Should Not Ban Guns1316 Words   |  6 Pagessafer. In the 2nd amendment in the Bill of Rights, the founding fathers of America gave us the right to bear arms for self-defense. Everyone in America has the right to own a firearm, but you must have a concealed carry permit to bring a hidden handgun into a public areas. With people carrying concealed guns we can reduce violent crimes. Each state has their own rules on concealed weapons. The state has a long process in order to get your concealed carry permit. If you want a permit you first mustRead MoreGun Control Laws On The United States And Other Countries891 Words   |  4 Pagesto help stop people from killing each other, well that’s what we are always were told. I have gathered multiple facts and data to help compare different countries on what methods they have chosen to help reduce gun violence. Comparing the laws on banning guns in other countries such as, Australia’s law on how there government thought would help to reduce gun violence and to gather a better understanding on their methods of action. In 1996 after Australia’s mass shootings, the government proposed andRead MoreThe Issue Of Gun Control1552 Words   |  7 Pagesas protection in our life. Having firearm at home can decrease the rate of crime because people can show that they have weapons to have equal chance to fight the armed burglars who break into people’s property. Having a basic non semi-automatic handgun can help people to protect personal property and safety. For example, most people who have firearm at home because they want to use the firearm as protection. According to Tomas Bentley from â€Å"Gun control is wrong on so many levels†, the author stated

Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients free essay sample

Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test. For the most part, welfare recipients respect the requirements of their contract with the agency. The drug testing will just be used to eliminate any persons taking advantage of the welfare program for inappropriate use and to ensure that the welfare will go to the people who are actually in need of it. While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification. In order to decide whether or not drug testing is a logical and fair requirement, all the pros and cons need to be laid out on the table. As for the pros of the required drug testing, there are quite a few to take into consideration. The first pro to consider is that it’s not fair to the tax payers to have to pay for others’ drug addictions. It will be difficult to avoid logical fallicies on this topic. Because I am coming down on one side of this discussion and want to persuade my audience, I will want to use comments and information from those that view it as I do. Using statistics that are deemed factual will help in showing that these are not just biased opinions from politicians that are simply looking for another vote. If I were to begin to persuade a city council meeting or write a letter to my local government representatives about the importance of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients, I would begin by saying: Welfare is not an entitlement! It was never intended to be as such. When President Roosevelt enacted the Social Security Act in 1935, it was during the great depression, when 25% of Americans were unemployed. Since then welfare has generously extended its hand to millions of Americans (2012). When someone is benefitting from these programs, and is not deemed disabled, it should be viewed as a â€Å"hand up† not a â€Å"hand out†. It is an issue all over the country that welfare is being abused by its benefactors. Cards are being used for ATM withdrawals, to purchase liquor, buying cigarettes, and even gambling in casinos. Food stamps are being openly traded for drugs (Camden, 2011). Not to mention the deception that is occurring about how many dependents a recipient is responsible for. To be subjected to a simple urine test to receive money and benefits from the U. S, government is not too much to bear. It is no different than obliging to mandatory drug testing for a job. Florida state governor Rick Scott has stated that in his state alone they will save 9 million dollars a year because of benefits being cut due to mandatory drug testing. With these kinds of cuts in spending nationwide, it is sure to reduce government spending a great deal. Not to mention the effect it will have on drug abusers. Florida state governor Rick Scott has implemented drug counseling on a volunteer basis for those benefactors that test positive (Delaney, 2011). Cuts in spending, responsible distribution of benefits and reductions in drug abuse, this sounds like a win-win scenario for us all. References Author Unknown, (2012), The History of Welfare, Retrieved from: http://www. elfareinfo. org/history/ Delaney, A. , (2011, November 27). Rick Scott Backs Drug Tests for Welfare Beneficiaries, Public Worker, and Himself, Retrieved from: http://www. huffingtonpost. com/2011/09/27drug-testing-welfare-_n_983235-. html/ Camden, J. , (2011, February 04). The Spokesman-Review, Abuse of Welfare Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards Targeted, Retrieved from: http://www. spokesman. com/stories/2011/feb/04/abuse-of-welfare-electronic-benefits-transfer/